Abstract

The past few decades of criminology have been an age of integration. The totalizing methodological disputes of the twentieth century (waged among biological, psychological, and sociological theories of crime) have been set aside in favor of a more holistic view of criminological theories as various tools in the toolkit of understanding and preventing crime. This book argues that the next phase of integration in criminology will be – or could be – with the humanities. The movement is already underway with the (re)turn to qualitative, philosophical, rational analysis in the neoclassical school, in venues like the Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology, in calls to bring the liberal arts into “Introduction to Criminal Justice” courses, and in the emergence of unorthodox (non-scientific, non-academic, non-argumentative) approaches to criminology such as “cultural criminology,” “popular criminology,” and “public criminology.” By considering these recent innovations in light of the literary and philosophical pre-history of criminology, this book maps out the role of the Humanities in both the past and the future of criminology.

I also argue that the humanities can bring greater self-consciousness to criminal justice as a discipline and to those who practice it. On the level of the discipline, the humanities can help criminology better understand its own history which can, in turn, help a criminology prone to scientism reconnect with the complex social problems that prompted the field in the first place: the humanities can help criminology be more political. On the level of the practitioner, the humanities can help criminal justice professionals generally prone to action rather than contemplation develop skills of analytical and ethical reasoning: the humanities can help criminologists be more thoughtful. By being more analytical and more political, criminology will be better positioned to understand and prevent crime.