#  Chapter Three -- Crime as Drama, Justice as Theatre 

 



 ##  

  expand\_more  

 
  

 

 **Abstract**

 Chapter 3 offers some theoretical foundations for a Shakespearean approach to crime and justice: *crime as drama* and *justice as theatre*. First, Shakespeare’s drama opens up to us a criminology that takes seriously the notion of “the scene of the crime”—with its authors, actors, audiences, genres, conventions, characters, plots, costumes, props, settings, scripts, and speeches—a dramaturgy discussed in a reading of the deliberately Shakespearean structure and tenor of the most famous crime in U.S. history, John Wilkes Booth’s assassination of Abraham Lincoln. Second, scenes such as Shylock’s hearing in *The Merchant of Venice* and Angelo’s trial in *Measure for Measure* stage – literally *stage* – the deep theatricality of the justice system; just consider the theatrical architecture of the courthouse or the police press conference, with their front- and back-stages, their scripted speeches and improvisations, and us in the audience looking on.

 **Bibliography**

 Bernthal, C. A. (1992). Staging justice: James I and the trial scenes of *Measure for Measure*. *Studies in English Literature, 32,* 247-69.

 Drakakis, J. (1991). ‘Fashion it thus’: Julius Caesar and the politics of theatrical representation. *Shakespeare Survey, 44,*65-73.

 Griffin, T., &amp; Miller, M. (2008). Child abduction, AMBER alert, and *crime control theater*. *Criminal Justice Review, 33(2),* 159-76.

 Halio, J. (1993). Portia: Shakespeare’s Matlock? *Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature, 5(1),* 57-64.

 Kauffman, M. (2004). ‘There is going to be some splendid acting tonight.’ In *American Brutus: John Wilkes Booth and the Lincoln conspiracies* (pp. 194-225). New York: Random House.

 Lucking, D. (2010). Brutus’s reasons: Julius Caesar and the mystery of motive. *English Studies, 92(2),* 119-32.

 Portillo S., Rudes D., Viglione J., Nelson M., &amp; Taxman F. (2013). Front-stage stars and backstage producers: The role of judges in problem-solving courts. *Victims &amp; Offenders, 8(1),* 1-22.

 Spielmann, G. (2011). Judicial spectacle events as reality and as fiction. *Law and Humanities 5(1),* 259-70.

 Starling, R. (2005). ‘Scenes from the life of one who is suited for nothing’: Shakespeare and the question of mimesis. In Jonathan Holmes and Adrian Streete (Eds.), *Re-figuring Mimesis: Representation in Early Modern Literature* (pp. 15-36). Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.